Rk Team gp g a gpg s pim ppg ppo pp% ppga tsh pk% shg shga ga gaa sv sv% en
1 Babson 26 95 158 3.65 921 180 32 96 33.3 8 71 88.7 0 1 45 1.73 708 .940 3
2 Castleton 26 66 110 2.54 709 348 19 121 15.7 25 92 72.8 2 4 123 4.65 987 .889 4
3 Hobart 23 98 148 4.26 964 241 15 92 16.3 12 93 87.1 4 0 55 2.37 515 .904 1
4 Johnson & Wales (RI) 25 55 89 2.20 600 340 11 84 13.1 35 118 70.3 0 7 134 5.33 919 .873 4
5 Mass.-Boston 26 116 187 4.46 998 406 29 103 28.2 29 125 76.8 6 1 78 2.99 643 .892 5
6 New England Col. 27 110 188 4.07 944 415 28 128 21.9 21 117 82.1 6 1 81 2.99 763 .904 0
7 Norwich 28 105 173 3.75 999 206 28 116 24.1 5 73 93.2 3 0 24 0.85 626 .963 0
7 Skidmore 22 67 117 3.05 732 304 15 80 18.8 15 96 84.4 3 0 54 2.41 678 .926 2
9 Southern Me. 27 62 94 2.30 674 418 14 105 13.3 30 132 77.3 2 3 91 3.36 809 .899 3
10 Suffolk 25 59 96 2.36 649 358 19 102 18.6 29 125 76.8 3 3 107 4.23 876 .891 2
Rk Team gp g a gpg s pim ppg ppo pp% ppga tsh pk% shg shga ga gaa sv sv% en
1 Babson 18 68 118 3.78 661 130 22 64 34.4 6 46 87.0 0 1 32 1.76 474 .937 3
2 Castleton 18 50 81 2.78 496 236 16 95 16.8 18 69 73.9 2 3 86 4.70 691 .889 3
2 Hobart 16 75 118 4.69 714 145 12 65 18.5 8 60 86.7 2 0 40 2.47 335 .893 0
4 Johnson & Wales (RI) 18 32 51 1.78 410 270 5 62 8.1 29 92 68.5 0 4 112 6.17 694 .861 3
5 Mass.-Boston 18 82 133 4.56 734 268 21 77 27.3 25 87 71.3 5 0 55 3.04 434 .888 2
6 New England Col. 18 76 131 4.22 613 288 22 86 25.6 14 79 82.3 3 0 57 3.16 516 .901 0
7 Norwich 18 66 106 3.67 649 139 17 78 21.8 4 51 92.2 1 0 16 0.88 394 .961 0
7 Skidmore 16 51 93 3.19 558 235 12 63 19.0 11 70 84.3 2 0 42 2.59 501 .923 2
9 Southern Me. 18 44 67 2.44 481 277 11 73 15.1 20 90 77.8 1 2 58 3.16 541 .903 2
9 Suffolk 18 41 65 2.28 466 235 16 69 23.2 19 88 78.4 2 2 78 4.27 617 .888 2